Permalink Reply by snoseek on November 4, 2010 at 10:20pm
Permalink Reply by Hawk on November 5, 2010 at 7:41am
Permalink Reply by bob r/vortex on November 5, 2010 at 7:47am Just as they say to me about Sugarbush....who cares! This is a SR board. ;-)
Bwah, ha, ha, ha.....
OK I doubt this will spread out the pow hounds as they already knew and skied all these areas. and now that they are published, there will be even more people in there. Especially ones that previously did not know and did not really belong. Just plain marketing gone bad IMO.
Permalink Reply by Ripsaw on November 5, 2010 at 8:18am Just as they say to me about Sugarbush....who cares! This is a SR board. ;-)
Bwah, ha, ha, ha.....
OK I doubt this will spread out the pow hounds as they already knew and skied all these areas. and now that they are published, there will be even more people in there. Especially ones that previously did not know and did not really belong. Just plain marketing gone bad IMO.
Just as they say to me about Sugarbush....who cares! This is a SR board. ;-)
Bwah, ha, ha, ha.....
OK I doubt this will spread out the pow hounds as they already knew and skied all these areas. and now that they are published, there will be even more people in there. Especially ones that previously did not know and did not really belong. Just plain marketing gone bad IMO.
It just occured to me that this is gonna really spread out the powderhounds. I bet the existing trees are going to gonna hold up better. Looking forward to spending lots of time at the loaf when the snow starts flying!
Permalink Reply by Ripsaw on November 5, 2010 at 8:29am Major issue for Pow Hounds at Sugarloaf is whether or not they'll have a lift running that allows access to the terrain. Wind esp the 2 days after a noreaster is brutal up there.
snoseek said:It just occured to me that this is gonna really spread out the powderhounds. I bet the existing trees are going to gonna hold up better. Looking forward to spending lots of time at the loaf when the snow starts flying!
For the people that will ski this terrain...not a problem. T-Bar to the Spillway cross-cut over to King Pine and into Brackett Basin.
It never fails to amaze me how many people will give up a day of great skiing NOT to ride a t-bar. Bizarre.
KC said:Major issue for Pow Hounds at Sugarloaf is whether or not they'll have a lift running that allows access to the terrain. Wind esp the 2 days after a noreaster is brutal up there.
snoseek said:It just occured to me that this is gonna really spread out the powderhounds. I bet the existing trees are going to gonna hold up better. Looking forward to spending lots of time at the loaf when the snow starts flying!
Permalink Reply by Ripsaw on November 5, 2010 at 8:46am Agreed 100%. I'm aware of the TBar access, was pointing out that some (ok, maybe alot of) folks "give up" on epic days at SL due to the SQ, WT, KP, and TL chairs being down.
Ripsaw said:For the people that will ski this terrain...not a problem. T-Bar to the Spillway cross-cut over to King Pine and into Brackett Basin.
It never fails to amaze me how many people will give up a day of great skiing NOT to ride a t-bar. Bizarre.
KC said:Major issue for Pow Hounds at Sugarloaf is whether or not they'll have a lift running that allows access to the terrain. Wind esp the 2 days after a noreaster is brutal up there.
snoseek said:It just occured to me that this is gonna really spread out the powderhounds. I bet the existing trees are going to gonna hold up better. Looking forward to spending lots of time at the loaf when the snow starts flying!
Just as they say to me about Sugarbush....who cares! This is a SR board. ;-)
Bwah, ha, ha, ha.....
OK I doubt this will spread out the pow hounds as they already knew and skied all these areas. and now that they are published, there will be even more people in there. Especially ones that previously did not know and did not really belong. Just plain marketing gone bad IMO.
© 2012 Created by Sunday River.